Hegel refers to this struggle as the master-slave dialectic or relationship. Newer Post Older Post Home. Works by Francis Fukuyama. We no longer need to impose our dignity upon others. This will mark the end of ideology and therefore of history since such a society will be, according to Kojeve, a “post-political” society which won’t be divided by ideological differences.
In his Washington Post opinion piece, Fukuyama also addressed this point. Francis Fukuyama is a conservative political philosopher and economist.
Cultural Reader: Short summary: The End of History by Fukuyama – explanation
There will always be a winner and loser; so someone will be master, and someone is always going thesie be delegated to the status of slave. The End of History was never linked to a specifically American model of social or political organization.
Like Hegel, Fukuyama believes the striving for the full expression of our humanity is the driving force behind the progress of history. He especially singled out Islamwhich he described as having “bloody borders”.
This theory has faced criticismwith arguments largely resting on conflicting definitions of “war” and “mature democracy”. Hegelto summarize, saw history as evolving through conflict between opposing ideas Hegelian dialectics of thesis, antithesis and synthesis. For Fukuyama, the realization of an ideal political and economic system which has the essential elements of liberal democracy is the purpose behind the march of history.
To have complete access to the thousands of philosophy articles on this site, please. According to Hegel, people will gukuyamas attempt to overcome their subservient status and fight for the sake of their self-importance, their highest ideal being the desire to make the enemy respect their abilities, and so recognise their humanity.
The result is a conflict of beliefs that somehow must be resolved.
The End of History and the Last Man – Wikipedia
Inon the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the publication of the original essay, “The End of History? To have complete access to the thousands of philosophy articles on this site, please. Moreover, when Islamic states have actually been created, they were easily dominated by the powerful Western states. Newer Post Older Post Home. Following Britain’s decision to leave the European Union and the election of Donald Trump as President of the United States inFukuyama feared for the future of liberal democracy in the face of resurgent populism,    and the rise of a “post-fact world”,  saying that “twenty five years ago, I didn’t have a sense or bbrief theory about how democracies can go backward.
This Hegelian dialectic is a logical process fhesis in the events of history and unfolding over time. Thus a synthesis provides a temporary solution, until it too becomes histroy new thesis, or fuluyamas the historical sense, the new ideological state of society, which in its turn is also opposed; and this dialectical process continues until the development of the ultimate society.
However, what makes us human is our desire to be recognised fkkuyamas something more than just creatures with basic needs to be met. Agreeing on ends, men would have no large causes for which to fight. The end of history will be an age where liberal democracies will meet the economic and psychological needs of everyone in every nation. It has been argued that he might even be a Neoconservative on some points but this analyis been firmly shot down by him and his use of “ideal” systems which is firmly denounced by many Anarcho-Capitalists of the same rote who believe that no government can be good.
For it must be cried out, at a time when rhesis have the audacity to neo-evangelize in the name of the ideal of a liberal democracy that has finally realized itself as the ideal of human history: Like Hegel, Snd believes this process towards the end of history will not be smooth and linear. According to Hegel, people will eventually attempt to overcome their subservient status and fight for the sake of their self-importance, their highest ideal being the desire to make the enemy respect their abilities, and so recognise their humanity.
Some have argued against the book due to an ideological disagreement with the concept of liberal democracy.
Fukuyama would perhaps say that countries such as Russia and China have not yet enf their systems to incorporate both liberalism and capitalism because briet is reluctance amongst the ruling elites to completely abandon communist ideals, although at the same time they do see the need to participate successfully in the global market.
In his Washington Post opinion piece, Fukuyama also addressed this point. In “The End of History and the Last Man” Fukuyama sees the end of briec Cold-War and the fall of the Berlin Wall as marking the end of ideological conflict with the unchallenged establishment of Western liberal democracy as the final ideological stage of fukuamas evolution. Fukuyama’s thesis in “The End of History and the Last Man” was heavily criticized by both other historical thinkers and history itself.
And yet Fukuyama still uses a movement toward empirical observations, which he himself grants are imperfect and incomplete, to validate an idea that is purely idealistic and transcendent of any empirical reality or possibility.
However, what makes us human is our desire to be recognised as something more than just creatures with basic needs to be met.